Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uc!noc.MR.NET!msi.umn.edu!umeecs!umich!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!mcnc!thorin!sargent!cullip
From: cullip@sargent.cs.unc.edu (Timothy Cullip)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: ASDG VD0: does not work! (ADDENDUM)
Message-ID: <17055@thorin.cs.unc.edu>
Date: 25 Oct 90 12:33:25 GMT
References: <1990Oct24.233018.29972@wpi.WPI.EDU>
Sender: news@thorin.cs.unc.edu
Reply-To: cullip@sargent.cs.unc.edu (Timothy Cullip)
Organization: University Of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lines: 33

In article <1990Oct24.233018.29972@wpi.WPI.EDU> longshot@wpi.WPI.EDU (Kenneth M Botwinick) writes:
>It seems I created a tidle wave with my question about VD0:

(stuff deleted, and now the important parts)

>Here is a new and interesting twist to my problem.  I have adram 540
>for the 500 which is populated with 4 megs.
>Now if I run adram I will never have a recoverable ram disk.

>I'm tired of things not working and of Guru's.  Commodore is trying my
>patience.  Of course it's just like our country.  I love the country
>but hate the government.  The government and Commodore both have their
>heads up their *sses.

I don't understand why everyone dumps on Commodore.  You say it's their
fault, but did they write VD0:? (I'll give you a hint - the answer is
no).  Did they manufacture adram 540? (I'll give you another hint, the
answer is still no!).  If you have a complaint, direct it to te people
responsible.  Commodore can't be responsible for the products that
others produce that run on their machines.

Yes, if I were you, I'd be frustrated that these products don't work
in a cooperative manner - but don't flame Commodore.


   Tim Cullip


PS : By the way, who elected our government?


   Tim Cullip
   cullip@cs.unc.edu