Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ub4b!syteke!jim From: jim@syteke.be (Jim Sanchez) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: ASDG VD0: does not work! (ADDENDUM) Message-ID: <1652@syteke.be> Date: 25 Oct 90 09:25:26 GMT References: <1990Oct24.233018.29972@wpi.WPI.EDU> Organization: Hughes LAN Systems, Inc - European Support Office Lines: 63 In article <1990Oct24.233018.29972@wpi.WPI.EDU> longshot@wpi.WPI.EDU (Kenneth M Botwinick) writes: >It seems I created a tidle wave with my question about VD0: stuff deleted >machine. But when I do run setpatch there is no hope. > see below > >My NEW question: Is setpatch 1.34 REALLY necessary? Is this the latest >version. My version of kickstart is 34.5 and my version of workbench >is 34.28 if this is any help. I really want a recoverable ram disk. It cannot hurt see below. > >Here is a new and interesting twist to my problem. I have adram 540 >for the 500 which is populated with 4 megs. It fits where the A501 >would go. Now 2 megs of it is autoconfig. The other two megs can >only be recognized if I run an included program called adram. >Now if I run adram I will never have a recoverable ram disk. Anyone >know why? Why would ANYONE want such a kluge ??? > >I'm tired of things not working and of Guru's. Commodore is trying my >patience. Of course it's just like our country. I love the country >but hate the government. The government and Commodore both have their >heads up their *sses. How about a little quality control for our computer? Now this is a little interesting that you flame CBM (who occasionally really needs it by the way) for making a product that give problem with NON-reccomended products. For instance the adram thing sounds like a kluge to me since (a) it doesn't appear to autoconfig properly and (b) probably exceeds the power supply's rating or adds too much heat. In the case of VD0: I have a 2000 and it work just fine and I have been using it on a 1000 before that. I also have a 2620. So I don't think it is the vd0: that is the problem. Are you using setpatch -r (for 1 meg chip machines only)? Anyway why are you bitching to CBM about problems that YOU caused - I just don't understand it? >If something sucks or doesn't work right, Don't release it. It only >hurts the image of our computer. And image is everything. Our Why the hell buy crap that does not meet manufacturers specs? >computer may be great, but no one except students, profs, and engineers >know that. Apple and IBM have the ignorance of the masses behind them. > > sig stuff deleted >-- > Kenneth M. Botwinick (508) 792-5622 > Longshot@wpi@wpi.edu 100 Institue Rd. Box 2235 > Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, Mass. 01609 Cheers -- Jim Sanchez | jim@syteke.be (PREFERRED) Hughes LAN Systems | OR uunet!mcsun!ub4b!syteke!jim Brussels Belgium | OR {sun,hplabs}!sytek!syteke!jim -- Jim Sanchez | jim@syteke.be (PREFERRED) Hughes LAN Systems | OR uunet!mcsun!ub4b!syteke!jim Brussels Belgium | OR {sun,hplabs}!sytek!syteke!jim