Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!sdcc6!babymilo!lindwall
From: lindwall@babymilo.ucsd.edu (John Lindwall)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: IconEdit not working under 2.0
Message-ID: <13553@sdcc6.ucsd.edu>
Date: 25 Oct 90 01:18:58 GMT
References: <1990Oct18.165719.3081@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <15355@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@sdcc6.ucsd.edu
Organization: CSE Dept., UC San Diego
Lines: 18
Nntp-Posting-Host: babymilo.ucsd.edu

In article <15355@cbmvax.commodore.com> andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel) writes:
>In article <1990Oct18.165719.3081@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) writes:
>>
>>	[IconEdit drop feature clips big icons]
>
>No; its a known 'feature'  :-)
>
>andy finkel		{uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy
>Commodore-Amiga, Inc.

Though I'm sure others may complain about this feature, I am thankful it
was done.  It will hopefully reduce the proliferation of huge, cheesy,
looking icons.  Yes, the feature limits the creative freedom of icon
designers -- but discipline and moderation are to be admired in all
endeavors.  Is there a WorkBench style guide which addresses such issues?
-- 
John Lindwall			lindwall@ucsd.edu
"Oh look at me! I'm all flooby! I'll be a son of a gun!" -- Flaming Carrot