Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!LSUVM.BITNET!$CSD211
From: $CSD211@LSUVM.BITNET (Mark Orr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Apple on new Macs (from the Computer Chronicles)
Message-ID: <9010251129.AA16026@apple.com>
Date: 24 Oct 90 23:37:31 GMT
References: <mcgurrin@MWUNIX.MITRE.ORG>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 21


>When it comes to games (an important part of the home market) it seems the
>lowly C64 is much better supported than the II.  This has always surprised
>me, but most stores I go to have larger C64 sections than II sections, and
>a quick glance through any issue of Computer Gaming World over the last
>several years will show this to be true.  CGW is oriented more towards
>strategy games, and I'd say that most support in terms of game software is
>MS-DOS, followed by Amiga, then C64 and Mac, then the II.  Pretty sad...

You know what is even more pathetic...pick up a copy of RUN magazine
(the main magazine for the C64). What will you see in it's editorials?
CRITICISM OF COMMODORE. This magazine is produced by the International
Data Group Communications (IDG), WHICH ALSO PRODUCES INCIDER MAGAZINE;
in which you never see criticism of Apple policies (in the eyes of
Dan (Quayle) Muse, InCider's editor, John Sculley is a megagenius, and
the Macintosh is your friend)

----------------------------
Mark Orr                   !
$CSD211@LSUVM.SNCC.LSU.EDU !
----------------------------