Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:6286 unix-pc.uucp:352 comp.sys.att:10627
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!shelby!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!fithp!mhw
From: mhw@fithp.uucp (Marc Weinstein)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,unix-pc.uucp,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Hayes modem auto-bauding
Message-ID: <1990Oct19.233911.14507@fithp.uucp>
Date: 19 Oct 90 23:39:11 GMT
References: <909@gnosys.svle.ma.us>
Organization: Weinstein Computers
Lines: 21

From article <909@gnosys.svle.ma.us>, by gst@gnosys.svle.ma.us (Gary S. Trujillo):
> In <1990Oct12.034821.7146@fithp.uucp> mhw@fithp.uucp (Marc Weinstein) writes:
> 
> [ concerning my article about replacing uugetty ]
> 
> I think you missed the point.  With the new uugetty, you shouldn't need to
> send any BREAKs - ever!  The whole idea is to have the uugetty take care of
> matching the interface speed to the connection speed so you don't have to
> send BREAKs.

What's the 'new uugetty' you mention?  Is this the getty that was posted
to sources some time ago?  A five part shar?

Does your statement above imply that a) system A calls my system, b) system
A's modem looks for 1200 baud connect, my uugetty is set to 2400 baud, but
system A is able to get my modem to connect when the proper tone is sent,
c) my uugetty recognizes that the connection was made at 1200 baud and
it adjusts accordingly?  I assume this scenario requires that the modem
can auto-baud using various tones.

Marc Weinstein