Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!johnsone
From: johnsone@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Syquest Removables: Good or Bad?
Message-ID: <88500027@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 25 Oct 90 06:26:00 GMT
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:<Yb98DTC00UhW42OUlK@andrew.cmu.e:-35:uxh.cso.uiuc.edu:88500027:000:664
Nf-From: uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!johnsone    Oct 25 01:26:00 1990


/* Written 12:54 pm  Oct 23, 1990 by rc3h+@andrew.cmu.edu */
 > /* ---------- "Syquest Removables: Good or Bad?" ---------- */
 > I've read the comments previously posted on the net.  I've also read the
 > last two MacWeeks which throw some doubt on the reliability of the
 > drives.  What's the real truth?  Are there reputable dealers of Syquest
 > 45M removable drives at reasonable prices out there or are all the
 > drives bad?

I haven't seen these reports (rumors?) in MacWeek, but if you want some
general info about the syquests (about 6 months old), check out a summary
available by anonymous ftp to sumex-aim.stanford.edu, in info-mac/report
directory.