Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!mtxinu!unisoft!hoptoad!fidogate!f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Sonny.Shrivastava
From: Sonny.Shrivastava@f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Sonny Shrivastava)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Amiga 3000 + Amax == Ii
Message-ID: <7875.271B9F26@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 13 Oct 90 08:08:00 GMT
Sender: ufgate@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:161/555 - MacCircles, Pleasanton CA
Lines: 17

It might help me if you quoted the part of my message you were responding 
to, because I have no idea what you are talking about.  If you're claiming 
the Amiga is superior to the Mac, buzz off.  That argument is moot, because 
the Macs are accepted in business and industry.  The Amiga is not.  I had an 
Amiga for a couple of years - it was one headache after another.
        
Anybody seriously considering the Amiga better think twice before parting 
with his/her money.  You're way off the beaten track if you get an Amiga, and 
I think any smart computer-wise individual will tell you that.  Of course, if 
you have a special need for the Amiga's video capabilities, then it is 
undoubtedly the machine for you.  However, for general purpose computing, 
stick to the popular and known computers.

--  
Sonny Shrivastava - via FidoNet node 1:125/777
    UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!fidogate!161!555!Sonny.Shrivastava
INTERNET: Sonny.Shrivastava@f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG