Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!mvb.saic.com!dayvb!udcps3!ncrlnk!ncrstp!npdiss1!pasek From: pasek@npdiss1.StPaul.NCR.COM (Michael A. Pasek) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: New Binary Distribution Method Summary: Mail archive servers already exist Keywords: comp.binaries.mac archive binaries Message-ID: <657@npdiss1.StPaul.NCR.COM> Date: 19 Oct 90 14:39:20 GMT Expires: 25 Oct 90 23:00:00 GMT References: <12240004@hpfcmgw.HP.COM> Reply-To: pasek@c10sd3.StPaul.NCR.COM (M. A. Pasek) Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.misc Distribution: na Organization: NCR Comten, Inc. Lines: 76 In article <12240004@hpfcmgw.HP.COM> davea@hpfcmgw.HP.COM (Dave Arns) writes: [text of message to Roger Long (c.b.m moderator) suggesting that Roger set up an archive of the c.b.m postings that can be accessed by mail requests] >Sometimes though, I realize a need for a particular program days or weeks >after it has been removed from the postings, or, because of fumblefingers Do as I do: It doesn't matter whether you think you'll need it....take it anyway. That way, if you decide "days or weeks" later that you need it, you'll have it. >What do you think of this proposal: > o Set up an e-mail auto-respond program such that people could just mail > an electronic request to a particular address; the e-mail messages would > contain special text strings that identify available programs. There are many mail servers that perform this function, although perhaps not ALL the c.b.m postings will be available through these services. If there is NOT a site that has all the c.b.m postings, I think it would be easier for all concerned (especially Roger) to expand the existing service(s) to include ALL the c.b.m material, rather than to ask Roger to set up an archive server. > o Every week or so, post a message to comp.sys.mac.misc that gives a list > of all the binaries that are available, a brief description, and the This would be nice, but I think the sheer size of such a list (for some of the servers) would be prohibitive. Perhaps a short "Archive Servers and How to Use Them" every couple of weeks (somewhat like the "Anonymous FTP LIST) would be helpful. I could also see a list of the most recent additions (last couple of months' worth) to an archive, along with a brief description, as being useful. > o If a requestor asked for a non-existent binary (either because of a > misspelling or because it has already been removed), the auto-responder > would send a mail message to that effect. I think the existing servers work this way. I can't speak with authority on these matters, since I've only sent one request to a server, and that was just to get a list of what was available. >I don't know whether the above scenario would work or be practical, but I >think it would be very useful for many people. It would be more of a "random >access" method, as opposed to the "serial access" of comp.binaries.mac. Once >it was set up, the actual shipping of the binaries would be zero extra work, >and because of the time savings there, maybe more binaries could be offered >(assuming disk space exists...). Also, people in charge of other archives >might set up a similar distribution method. This would be handy for people >like me because, working at Hewlett-Packard, our Internet connection is a >closed subnet (for security reasons), so I can't get to any of the apple.com >or sumex archives. But since e-mail works perfectly well, this would meet the >need of such folks. Although there may be some "time savings" (in the sense of HUMAN time), the machine usage would skyrocket, along with line costs (at least for Roger's phone!). Since you can't do FTP (we also have a "closed" subnet, but at least our gateway allows us to do FTP/Telnet out, but no one can do either coming in...), I suggest you try the server at Rice University (the only one I can think of off the top of my head). >If the above proposal is worth pursuing, I would be willing to be a alpha/beta >tester, so as to get the bugs out of the system before being inundated with >requests. >What do you think? Would it work? I think this proposal would be much more warmly received if YOU had offered to provide this "archive/mail server" :-) Sure, it would work, but I think you're asking the wrong person/organization to do it.... >Thanks, >Dave Arns You're welcome. M. A. Pasek Software Development NCR Comten, Inc. (612) 638-7668 MNI Development 2700 N. Snelling Ave. pasek@c10sd3.StPaul.NCR.COM Roseville, MN 55113