Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Surely A Iifx Blows An Amiga 3
Keywords: amiga, amax
Message-ID: <1990Oct25.070305.30776@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 25 Oct 90 07:03:05 GMT
References: <7876.271B9F29@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG> <1990Oct21.034446.9842@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1990Oct22.203332.29159@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News)
Distribution: na
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 23

In article <1990Oct22.203332.29159@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> wieser@cs-sun-fsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca (Bernhard Wieser) writes:
>Does anyone know what amax announces itself as?  I would like to have
>my software NOT run when it sees an emulator.
>
	It announces itself as a Mac Plus. I don't think you want
to get rid of all Mac Pluses. Why would you care if it ran on an
emulator? You'd make more sales that way. Is there a "purity"
issue here that you wouldn't want your software running on one
of those ICKY Commodore or Atari machines? They both make very
nice Macs. 8)

>Bernie Wieser
>Someone somewhere at U of C
>Working and being educated somewhere at some time sometimes


	-- Ethan

Ethan Solomita: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu

GorbachevAwards++;
free (SovietUnion);
IndependentRepublics += 15;