Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!crdgw1!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!boulder!domingo
From: domingo@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Alberto Domingo)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: silly news
Message-ID: <28683@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 25 Oct 90 19:46:43 GMT
References: <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> <9519@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: domingo@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Alberto Domingo)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 31

In article <9519@helios.TAMU.EDU> cnh5730@calvin.tamu.edu (Chuck Herrick) writes:
>In article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) writes:
>> IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER.
>
>No, it's not silly. If you had a NeXT and had ever used a mac, you would know
>that 
>	NeXT IS better than a crapple mac.


What is better? an apple or an orange? a formula 1 or a truck?
clasic music or rock? a live concert or a CD record? onions or potatos?
New York or Paris? pepsicola or cocacola? democrats or republicans?
Bach or Bethoven? your taste or my taste? a Mac+ ($700 now, or less) or
a NeXT ($3000, I'm not sure)?


:-)













Alberto.