Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!motcsd!mcdcup!mcdchg!tellab5!mtcchi!fjo
From: fjo@mtcchi.uucp (2667-Frank Owen(ZG90210)0000)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Yet more THINK C suggestions
Message-ID: <1990Oct18.191531.29325@mtcchi.uucp>
Date: 18 Oct 90 19:15:31 GMT
References: <21107@well.sf.ca.us> <16707@thorin.cs.unc.edu> <15577@reed.UUCP>
Organization: Memorex Telex Corporation NSBG/STP
Lines: 23

chaffee@reed.UUCP (Alex Chaffee) writes:


>  - how about true inline functions?  Come on; you've got an assembler and a
>  compiler right there; why make us hand-assemble our inline functions into
>  machine code?  (cf. p.125)  Something like

>inline pascal void PrOpenPage() {
>	asm { 
>		move.l #0x10000808, -(SP)
>		_PrGlue
>	}
>}


THINK C already allows you to define this is a macro, that would yield
exactly the same code as the inline would.

-- 
	Frank Owen (fjo@mtcchi.uucp)  708-305-3182
	Memorex-Telex Corporation   Indian Hill Court 
	1000 E. Warrenville Rd.  RM 1A315
	Naperville, Il 60563