Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!cs-col!vause From: vause@cs-col.Columbia.NCR.COM (Sam Vause) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr Subject: Re: Does uucp have to be slow? Message-ID: <1990Oct25.002637.2437@cs-col.Columbia.NCR.COM> Date: 25 Oct 90 00:26:37 GMT References: <4221@lib.tmc.edu> Reply-To: vause@cs-col.Columbia.NCR.COM (Sam Vause) Organization: Corporate Customer Services NCR E&M Columbia, SC Lines: 44 In article <4221@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu (Jay Maynard) writes: >In the process of getting my shiny new Tower XP running, I need to transfer >about 30 meg of data from my current PC/AT system. My options are 360K PC-DOS >disks (yuk!) or uucp over a serial cable. Of those two, I'd much rather do >uucp. I'm running SysV 3.02.01, without the HDB enhancement (I have it, but >haven't installed it), and an octal I/O board (not the HPSIO :-( ). > >I was able to get the two machines talking. There are two problems: 1) It >won't run over 1200 BPS, and 2) it won't run for more than a few hours. In >both cases, the failure mode is the same: The AT (running Microport System >V/AT 2.4, with HDB) eventually hangs, and, if I used Uutry to start the >connection, reports an "alarm 1". The Tower simply gives up, leaving the >status "CONVERSATION" in the STST.* file. I have to reboot the AT to clear >out the uucico process. > >I have the AT set up to initiate the connection, and the Tower has the port >defined to be a dial-in port (it's /dev/tty00, if that matters). I haven't >tried running it the other way yet. > >Any suggestions out there? Should I have the Tower call the AT? Should I jump >through the hoops required to get HDB on the Tower (I don't expect the >installation to be difficult, but getting the file to the Tower may be)? >Do I need to scrounge an HPSIO? Who killed Laura Palmer? :-) > >Thanks in advance... >BTW, if anyone has doubts about the value of Usenet, just ask a technical >question. You'll see the value in no time! :-) Trust me, you *WANT* to get an HPSIO board into that system. Verify whether your system has a 9-pin RS-232 connector(s), or whether it has 15-pin. The only difference for the HPSIO upgrade is that if you already have the 15-pin ones, you are spared the hassle ordering the TTY bulkhead plate itself. In any case, you get the joy of ordering and installing the HPSIO-to-Bulkhead cables. Lotsa' little screws! The HPSIO will allow you to speak at least 9.6K baud to the AT... +---------------------------------------------------------------+ |Sam Vause, NCR Corporation, Customer Services - TOWER Support | |3325 Platt Springs Road, West Columbia, SC 29169 (803) 791-6953| | vause@cs-col.Columbia.NCR.COM | | ...!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!cs-col!vause | | ...!ucbvax!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!ncrcae!cs-col!vause | +---------------------------------------------------------------+