Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!sgi!shinobu!odin!mitch
From: mitch@sgi.com (Thomas Mitchell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: Fun and games with ++ operators
Summary: Look under keyboards too.
Message-ID: <1990Oct23.000030.5388@odin.corp.sgi.com>
Date: 23 Oct 90 00:00:30 GMT
References: <9009211425.AA04291@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca> <1990Sep28.223417.7571@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1990Sep28.224937.7838@odin.corp.sgi.com>
Sender: news@odin.corp.sgi.com (Net News)
Organization: Silicon Graphics Computer Systems,  Mountain View CA. 94039
Lines: 22

In article <1990Sep28.224937.7838@odin.corp.sgi.com> bh@sgi.com (Bent Hagemark) writes:
* In article <1990Sep28.223417.7571@odin.corp.sgi.com> pkr@sgi.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
* >In article <9009211425.AA04291@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca> mike@SNOWHITE.CIS.UOGUELPH.CA writes:
* >>			printf("%d %d\n", a[i++], a[i++]);
* >>    Depending on the order of evaluation of function arguments, ...

* 
* The warning just happens to be on the most important page of K&R C.
* For the 2nd edition this is page 53.  I know this because a copy of it
* is taped to my office wall right next to my screen!
* 
* Bent


And under the keyboard of another engineer is a Xerox(tm) of
the Precedence and Order of Evaluation table from page 49 of
K&R (1978).

--
--
  Thomas P. Mitchell   --  mitch@sgi.com  or mitch%relay.csd@sgi.com
	"All things in moderation; including moderation."