Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!unido!opal!pierrot From: pierrot@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Tatjana Heuser) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Interleaf Keywords: interleaf Message-ID: <2117@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: 24 Oct 90 23:02:00 GMT References: <15057@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM> Sender: news@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de Lines: 18 Nntp-Posting-Host: troll.cs.tu-berlin.de I used to take Interleaf at work for documentation purposes. For that it's great. It's only for mathematical purposes I wasn't that confident and returned to TeX. btw. Does anybody know to what extent TeX sources were used for the programming of interleaf? Imho the concepts are very much alike, expect that Interleaf managed to do a really good wysiwyg job. (before seeing interleaf I planned something of that kind for myself. Knowing the job would be a bit "too large" for me I was rather glad to see Interleaf to have done the job already :-) What I'd really like would be Interleaf to produce an optional TeX output for future editing. (mathematical stuff as _large_ integrals, etc.) -tatjana -- Pierrot le fou | UUCP: pierrot@tubopal.UUCP (pierrot@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de) Tatjana Heuser | ...!unido!tub!opal!pierrot (Europe) D-1000 Berlin 30 | ...!pyramid!tub!opal!pierrot (World) Ettaler Str.2 | BITNET: pierrot%tubopal@DB0TUI11.BITNET (saves $$$)