Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!unido!opal!pierrot
From: pierrot@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Tatjana Heuser)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: Interleaf vs Framemaker
Message-ID: <2118@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: 24 Oct 90 23:26:27 GMT
References: <JONAS.90Sep26131837@his.se>
Sender: news@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: troll.cs.tu-berlin.de

jonas@his.se (Jonas Mellin) writes:


>I have read the summary about Framemaker. Has anyone a summary about
>Interleaf? If not, could you please mail me what you think about
>Interleaf vs Framemaker. I mostly interrested in the functionality on
>SUN SPARC stations.

Title:     Interleaf pulls ahead of Framemaker
Subtit:    They were neck to neck until Interleaf came out with 4.0
Author:    Alan Southerton
Published: Unix World December 1988

-tatjana
--
Pierrot le fou      | UUCP: pierrot@tubopal.UUCP (pierrot@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de)
Tatjana Heuser      |         ...!unido!tub!opal!pierrot (Europe) 
D-1000 Berlin 30    |         ...!pyramid!tub!opal!pierrot (World)
Ettaler Str.2       | BITNET: pierrot%tubopal@DB0TUI11.BITNET (saves $$$)