Xref: utzoo comp.unix.admin:385 comp.unix.msdos:146
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!wuarchive!emory!att!cbnews!mvadh
From: mvadh@cbnews.att.com (andrew.d.hay)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.msdos
Subject: Re: Concurrent UNIX
Summary: coherent & dos executables
Keywords: cheap UNIX, PC, MS-DOS
Message-ID: <1990Oct26.124012.13358@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 26 Oct 90 12:40:12 GMT
References: <11040@hacgate.UUCP> <1990Oct25.222951.926@mentor.com>
Followup-To: comp.unix.admin
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 18

In article <1990Oct25.222951.926@mentor.com>, sboyle@mentor.com (Sean Boyle x1542) writes:
> I have been using it for some months now.  I wanted an alternative to
> messy dos and coherent was cheap.  I have been able to compile quite a
> few unix utilities and things on it successfully with minor tweaking.
> 
> It is something like an early (V6 or V7) sort of UNIX.  The complaints
> I have are:
[]
> Besides all that, It is MUCH better to me than MSDOS.

pardon me if the answer is obvious, but i've forgotten:
will coherent run dos executables?

-- 
Andrew Hay		+------------------------------------------------------+
Ragged Individualist	| 	You just have _N_O idea!  It's the difference    |
AT&T-BL Ward Hill MA	|	between _S_H_O_O_T_I_N_G a bullet and _T_H_R_O_W_I_N_G it!     |
a.d.hay@att.com		+------------------------------------------------------+