Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!hokulea!msawyer From: msawyer@hokulea.hig.hawaii.edu (Michael Sawyer (REU)) Newsgroups: comp.unix.large Subject: Re: Epoch like filesystem Message-ID: <9935@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu> Date: 19 Oct 90 02:57:39 GMT References: <60058@bbn.BBN.COM> <11709@celit.fps.com> <12778@vpk4.UUCP> <12795@vpk1.UUCP> Sender: news@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu Reply-To: msawyer@hokulea.UUCP (Michael Sawyer (REU)) Organization: University of Hawaii, Honolulu Lines: 52 In article <12795@vpk1.UUCP> craig@vpk1.ATT.COM (Craig Campbell) writes: >In article rodney@dali.ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II) writes: [...] >>I do... They are about $200 per 5.25" 600 meg platter. A ten disk juke >>box costs about $10,000 and is a scsi device. The problem is lack of >>software -- this 6 gigabyte thing acts like some sort of large dumb scsi >>object without the proper software. > >The one we have is not a juke box but rather uses removable optical disks >one at a time. The disk capacity is 300 meg/side (I think). > We have one of the 10 disk jukebox systems on our Sun system, and have had less than ideal luck with it. For one thing, it uses a window based program to control the mounting and dismounting of the disks loaded into the machine. This means that, as the software stands now, an operator MUST go to the console and select which disk is being used. There is no way to do this automatically. (What I would like to see is a method of having 20 mount points (2 sides/disk. The thing's robotic arm actually flipps the disk over when you use side B!) per disk. That way, I can write a file to /jb1a to get to disk, then /jb6b to use disk 6, side b. I realize that this would have to work in a method similar to the automounter, where the system sits there waiting for a request for one of the disks, loads it, and mounts it at the appropriate point. The hardest point here is when two users ask for different disks. I may end up trying to write something to do this, and lock out other users when anyone has access to the drive. For what we require, this will probably be fine... Also, I don't know how goot the quality control on these devices is at present. Our dept. has the jukebox we own as well as the standalone one disk drive. According to the people using the other system, they had a number of problems getting it working, and ours had a defective eject circuit (I had to take the D*** thing apart to get the disk out!). The company blamed it on their drivers, and wouldn't take it to be repeired for almost a month! When I did have the disk in the drive, I copied quite a few files onto it, deleted them, and so forth. The access time wasn't like a hard drive by any means, but it wasn't unreasonable either. (Sorry, I didn't do any benchmarks.) I am by no means an expert on this system or Unix (science comes before system management), but I do have some idea what's going on... Don't take what I say as the absolute truths. --- return mail to: msawyer@io.soest.hawaii.edu Michael Sawyer, Univ of Hawaii Physical Oceanography (They don't even know I am using rn, so I sure don't speak for UH!)