Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!wb3ffv!ka3ovk!raysnec!shwake
From: shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: System V.4
Message-ID: <112@raysnec.UUCP>
Date: 23 Oct 90 16:23:05 GMT
References: <273@srchtec.UUCP>
Organization: IRS/CI - Technical Solutions Branch
Lines: 9

mra@srchtec.uucp (Michael Almond) writes:

>I compiled the X stuff directly from MIT on DECstation 2100's without any
>problem (DECwindows su*ks).  I've also heard people have the X11R4 running
>on PCs under Esix using the MIT stuff.

	There's a big difference between having something compile and run,
and having it run well. UnixWorld had a good survey (May, 1990) of the
various efforts to turn the generic MIT code into viable products.