Xref: utzoo sci.bio:3694 alt.romance:5174 soc.men:23532 soc.women:29611 soc.singles:71833
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!shelby!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!wp6
From: wp6@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Walter Pohl)
Newsgroups: sci.pschology,sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <1990Oct24.233638.1774@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 24 Oct 90 23:36:38 GMT
References: <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP>
Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News)
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 14

This is an Orange Highlighter alert.

In article <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> reiser@pmafire.UUCP (Steve Reiser) writes:
>begun to wonder what man's true nature really is. I have nothing against
		      ^^^
>Steve Reiser (reiser@pmafire.UUCP or ...!uunet!pmafire!reiser)

	When I read this article, at first I was confused as to whether you
meant "male" or "person".  All possible ambiguity would be removed if you 
used "person" in place of "man".


					Walt Pohl
		"alt.walt?  It has a certain ring to it, no?"