Xref: utzoo sci.psychology:3413 sci.bio:3706 alt.romance:5198 soc.men:23546 soc.women:29623 soc.singles:71926
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe!hindmost!garlow
From: garlow@lpl.arizona.edu (Kevin Garlow x2272)
Newsgroups: sci.psychology,sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <330@organpipe.UUCP>
Date: 25 Oct 90 19:38:24 GMT
References: <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <13922@cs.utexas.edu> <MIKEB.90Oct25090008@wdl31.wdl.fac.com>
Sender: news@organpipe.UUCP
Followup-To: sci.psychology
Organization: Lunar & Planetary Laboratory, Tucson AZ.
Lines: 18

In article <MIKEB.90Oct25090008@wdl31.wdl.fac.com> mikeb@wdl31.wdl.fac.com (Michael H Bender) writes:

	[deletions]
>
>female version.)  I would point out further that recent studies in biology
>have shown that numerous animals, once thought to be polygamous, are NOT.
                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^
>E.g., various species of birds that mate for life have recently been shown
>to have numerous "extra-marrital" relationships.
>
	[deletions]
>Mike Bender

	I *think* Mike meant to say that "Studies have shown that
numerous animals, once thought to be MONOGAMOUS, are not."  This would
jibe with the following sentence.

						Kevin Garlow