Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu!v071pzp4
From: v071pzp4@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Craig L Cole)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: orbiters
Message-ID: <42424@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 24 Oct 90 17:11:26 GMT
References: <5852@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <1990Oct23.150628.407@eng.umd.edu>
Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU
Reply-To: v071pzp4@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu
Organization: University at Buffalo
Lines: 16
Nntp-Posting-Host: ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4.3

In article <1990Oct23.150628.407@eng.umd.edu>, yun@eng.umd.edu (Dragon Taunter) writes...>

>Okay, someone has to ask.  Why not an OV-100?  Was Pathfinder given an
>OV number?

Enterprise is OV-100.

And yes, I had always wished NASA followed through on the refit
of Enterprise for space duty.

Seems like it would be a good time top do it, since Endeavour
has gotten all of the assembly lines running again...

                                          Craig Cole
                                          v071pzp4@ubvms.bitnet
                                          v071pzp4@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu