Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero!cs.duke.edu
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: A Moral Question
Message-ID: <656177075@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 17 Oct 90 15:24:36 GMT
References: <16098@s.ms.uky.edu> <kaveh.655919781@s.ms.uky.edu>
Sender: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Organization: Nefolet shel nemushot (Fallout of Wimps)
Lines: 12
Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Status: R


In article <kaveh.655919781@s.ms.uky.edu> (Kaveh Baharestan) writes:

>Porn is basically
>anti-feminist and promotes the objectification, humiliation, control,
>and hate of women.  
.......................................................................
>[What about lesbian pornography?    - MHN]

And what about all-men gay porno?

The anti-porno laws that were pushed by Andrea Dworkin and Catherine
Mackinnon defined all porno, gay porno explicitly included, as
"discrimination against women"; do you accept this definition for
all-men gay porno?