Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ora!daemon From: kaveh@ms.uky.edu (Kaveh Baharestan) Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: Who's Exploiting Who? Message-ID: Date: 25 Oct 90 20:55:14 GMT References: 5655@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <656608061@romeo.cs.duke.edu> Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz) Organization: U of Ky, Math. Sciences, Lexington KY Lines: 39 Approved: ambar@ora.com gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit) writes: >#Also the statement "there is no porn that..." must take into account >#homoerotic pornography. Is gay or lesbian porn sexist? >In article (Kaveh Baharestan) writes: >>The lesbian porn in forum is meant for cunsumption by men. That says ^^^^^ penthouse is described on the cover as "the internation magazine for men" or some such thing. >1) Do you define "On Our Backs" as porno for men? I've been asking my friends about "on our back" and they keep saying "off our backs?" I don't know what "on" is about. and i've never read "off". >2) Why it seems to you so strange that lesbians may enjoy lesbian porno? I didn't say it was strange! I was refering *specifically* to forum in penthouse and the lesbian sex in it! (If that is what you mean by thinking it strange for lesbians to enjoy lesbian porn.) I was not refering to lesbian novels that you find (or never find) in book stores. One of my favorite short stories is one by Katherine V. Forest about a space vampire and her lover. I love vampires. >3) Why have you ignored the question about all-men gay porno? I've never read gay-men's porn so i cannot judge it. >4) If women enjoy all-men gay porno, does it mean that the men > are exploited by these women? it's porn isn't it :->