Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies From: gillies@m.cs.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Intel bugs / bugged by Intel :-( Message-ID: <3300203@m.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 28 Oct 90 05:10:00 GMT References: <90@ Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #R: Intel and Motorola BOTH treat bug lists as confidential. As a customer, you > should be able to get bug lists from either, though you may have to sign an > NDA. I would ALWAYS insist on getting bug lists from a vendor if I was > starting a design with their chip, and I'd ask every month or two for the > updated version. What we need is a Ralph Nader or Mike Wallace/60 Minutes Team to STOP THIS PRACTICE. It is downright stupid. Today more than ever people are working on languages that depend on dynamic code generation for speed and correctness. Without a list of these instruction sequence bugs, these language implementations are in great peril. Don W. Gillies, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois 1304 W. Springfield, Urbana, Ill 61801 ARPA: gillies@cs.uiuc.edu UUCP: {uunet,harvard}!uiucdcs!gillies