Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!emory!wuarchive!usc!apple!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: AMD vs. Intel Arbitration
Message-ID: <1990Oct30.011848.5470@amd.com>
Date: 30 Oct 90 01:18:48 GMT
References: <1990Oct11.214112.1392@mozart.amd.com> <14616@netcom.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 15

Intel has said that they will ask the Santa Clara County Superior
Court to review the power of Judge Phelps, the arbitrator in the
iAPX86 technology dispute with AMD.

Translation: based on the results of the just concluded liability
phase, Intel is worried the arbitrator will award big damages in
the forthcoming penalty phase.

Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not for the company. I do
own some stock in both companies.

Source: EET 10/29.

--
I voted. Did you?