Xref: utzoo comp.sys.intel:1455 comp.arch:18968 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!olivea!apple!goofy.apple.com!esmith From: esmith@goofy.apple.com (Eric Smith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,comp.arch Subject: Re: Intel bugs / bugged by Intel :-( Message-ID: Date: 2 Nov 90 23:15:21 GMT References: <1990Oct30.210042.14836@mozart.amd.com> <35420@cup.portal.com> Sender: usenet@Apple.COM Distribution: usa Organization: Frobozz Magic Widget Company Lines: 14 In-reply-to: brad@cup.portal.com's message of 31 Oct 90 05:11:29 GMT In article <35420@cup.portal.com> brad@cup.portal.com (Paul B Anders) writes: Perhaps if AMD would develop some original products of its own that could generate the revenue that the "second-sourced" and cloned Intel parts do, then poor AMD wouldn't have to worry about the "deplorable" actions of Intel. Perhaps if Intel didn't violate second-source agreements it signed with AMD, AMD wouldn't complain about the deplorable actions of Intel. -- Eric L. Smith Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those esmith@apple.com of my employer, friends, family, computer, or even me! :-)