Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!rutgers!cbmvax!grr From: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Any REAL advantage of Trailblazer V.32 over MultiTech V.32? Keywords: TB+ Message-ID: <15492@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 31 Oct 90 17:09:47 GMT References: <298@twg.bc.ca> <68950@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 21 In article <68950@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> mikes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Michael Squires) writes: > In article mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes: > > > >Unfortunately, not all the Telebit modems support V.32. Only the > >T2500 and T1500 support it; the T1000 and Trailblazer Plus only > >support PEP at 9600, and your Multitech modem won't be able to talk to > > The TB+ runs PEP at 19.2K also, of course. Both the T1000 and the TB+ support a 19.2KBPS interface rate, with the TB+ being internally crippled to only support throuput at a 9600BPS rate. With a 19.2 KBPS interface rate TB+ performance is gererally much faster than 9600 KBPS, while there may be some measurable performance increase if both T1000's are running at 19,200 KBPS rather than 9,600... It's worth a try if you're using T1000's mostly for non-interactive use. -- George Robbins - now working for, uucp: {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr but no way officially representing: domain: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com Commodore, Engineering Department phone: 215-431-9349 (only by moonlite)