Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Any REAL advantage of Trailblazer V.32 over MultiTech V.32? Message-ID: Date: 1 Nov 90 17:52:45 GMT References: <300@twg.bc.ca> Sender: usenet@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 10 In-Reply-To: bill@twg.bc.ca's message of 1 Nov 90 08:47:17 GMT In article <300@twg.bc.ca> bill@twg.bc.ca (Bill Irwin) writes: I've heard that if a site has a T2500 (which supports both PEP and V.32) set in PEP mode, and an incoming call tries to establish a V.32 connection, the T2500 *will not* switch to V.32 mode. Well-behaved T2500s generally have S50=0, to allow any sort of modem to connect. The behavior you describe would be S50=255 (PEP only), which indicates that the T2500's owner doesn't want to talk to anything but another Trailblazer, in which case why did they bother buying the 2500's V.32 capability?