Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: gast@cs.ucla.edu (David Gast)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Another Problem With Centrex
Message-ID: <14060@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 26 Oct 90 06:50:31 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 15
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 766, Message 3 of 9


It seems that another disadvantage to Centrex is that a bug is easier
to place on a Centrex system than on a PBX system.  Since calls local
to the premises typically don't leave the premises with a PBX system,
a bug would have to placed on the premises.  With a Centrex system,
all calls are routed through the CO and so a bug can be conveniently
placed at the CO.  This bug would be able to monitor all calls
including those internal to the premises.


Given the cozy relationship between law enforcement and the telcos,
this problem is something to think about.


David