Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: eli@pws.bull.com (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: 800 Numbas
Message-ID: <14066@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 26 Oct 90 09:07:04 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 24
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 766, Message 9 of 9


MCI's claim that they can give you an 800 number with the last seven
digits being the same as your home phone # has got to be BS.

MCI doesn't own all the 800 "exchanges", so there's no way they can
assign the numbers as they say ... at least not for all customers.

Also, doesn't their "security code" feature mean that people at pulse
phones can't call?


eli


[Moderator's Note: Even if MCI *did* own all the 800 echanges, it
should be easy to see the fallacy in their presentation: My home
exchange 743 is duplicated in many area codes. If I got one of their
800 numbers, along with someone with the same number as mine in
another area code, then what? If the security codes were not used
properly by the caller, we'd wind up getting each other's calls. And
what about my existing 800 number which begins 747? If a
747-subscriber somewhere signs up with MCI for 800 service, does this
mean I now have to start using special codes to distinquish my calls
from his?  Steve is correct: someone at MCI got it *all* wrong!  PAT]