Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!sialis!quad!dts From: dts@quad.sialis.mn.org (David Sandberg) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: TC++ 1.01 is NOT TCPPT1 (was Borland's $15 Maintenance Upgrade Fee) Message-ID: <626@quad.sialis.mn.org> Date: 2 Nov 90 08:49:41 GMT References: <1990Oct29.152249.2240@athena.mit.edu> <625@quad.sialis.mn.org> <15628@reed.UUCP> Reply-To: dts@quad.sialis.mn.org (David Sandberg) Organization: Quadric Systems, Richfield MN Lines: 29 In article <15628@reed.UUCP> minar@reed.bitnet (Nelson Minar) writes: >In article <625@quad.sialis.mn.org> dts@quad.sialis.mn.org (David Sandberg) writes: >>Does anyone know if there are any bug fixes included in this "1.01" >>release beyond what was fixed by the TCPPT1.ZIP patch disk? > >I've said this 3 times before on the net, but here goes again. You must not have said it in comp.lang.c++ before, though, or else I'm getting very nearsighted in my old age. B-/ > TC++ 1.01 and TCPPT1.ZIP are two totally different things. The former >is a new release of the compiler. You will get new disks entirely. You're right. I know, because I just got my upgrade today (Federal Express, even - thanks, Borland). And I was never asked to pay for it either (if Bob Rusbasan is reading this, there's your answer)... but that might be explained by my name possibly being on file there as one who has called before with concerns about iostreams bugs. But the Borland rep couldn't tell me whether 1.01 had fixes above and beyond those in TCPPT1.ZIP when I called them to ask for the upgrade. (I would assume that at least all of the patches from TCPPT1.ZIP are in the new release.) That's why I asked here. If I bothered anyone in the process, I'm sorry. -- \\ David Sandberg \ ,=, ,=, \\ // dts@quad.sialis.com / | |uadric `=,ystems // \\ uunet!umn-cs!sialis!quad!dts \ `=\ `=' \\