Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Conventions and "tricks" used in Forth
Message-ID: <1924.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 27 Oct 90 02:41:40 GMT
Organization: String, Scotch tape, and Paperclips.  (in Pgh, PA)
Lines: 22


 Date: 10-23-90 (15:05)              Number: 4094 (Echo)
   To: RAY DUNCAN                    Refer#: NONE
 From: IAN WATTERS                     Read: NO
 Subj: CONVENTIONS AND "TRICKS"      Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

 =>RD>  The completely hashed dictionary eliminates this problem.

 How easily does your system forget words?  Removing items from hash
 tables tends to be messy...  except when using linked lists for clashes.
 Do you end up with 1024 linked lists with a 2K hash table?
   / /\ /\/
 ---
  ~ SLMR 1.0 ~ *** Note "address change" ***   Islington RIP, viva OLEF!

 PCRelay:OLEF -> #181 RelayNet (tm)
 4.10a15         The Node is OLEF, HUB is HUBOLEF1 in the UK

 NET/Mail : DC Information Exchange, MetroLink Int'l Hub.  (202)433-6639
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp