Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!noao!arizona!gudeman
From: gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
Message-ID: <26971@megaron.cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 30 Oct 90 20:26:17 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
Lines: 15

In article  <4349@lanl.gov> jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes:
]That has been my point.  If 'a' and 'b' aren't declared together in
]the same 'aliased' declaration, they _can't_ be aliased.  Not at all.

I don't see why you keep arguing that "arrays with this new 'alias'
declaration of mine" are more optimizable than "pointers without the
'alias' declaration".  You are comparing apples and oranges.  The
appropriate comparison is to compare the optimization potential of
arrays vs. pointers either both with or both without the 'alias'
declaration.
-- 
					David Gudeman
Department of Computer Science
The University of Arizona        gudeman@cs.arizona.edu
Tucson, AZ 85721                 noao!arizona!gudeman