Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!emory!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!mead
From: mead@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: MSP vs TP
Message-ID: <13000016@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 31 Oct 90 04:41:00 GMT
References: <PgiTR1w163w@infopls.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:<PgiTR1w163w@infopls.UUCP>:-26:uxh.cso.uiuc.edu:13000016:000:452
Nf-From: uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!mead    Oct 30 22:41:00 1990


RE the PC WORLD Sep 89 article, 

   there are bench marks and although I'd say the two were within
     "spitting distance," TP55 is the clear winner.

   TP's smart linking wasn't mentioned, I'd heard that Microsoft
      pascal (not QuickPascal per se) loaded all code in a unit
      even if only one procedure was called.

   QuickPascal's editor is nicer--lets you customize it a good deal
      (EMACS,Brief,...)

-alan mead : mead@uxh.cso.uiuc