Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!bu.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Do we really need types in OOPL's?
Message-ID: <58692@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 1 Nov 90 01:16:04 GMT
References: <1990Oct9.190813.23402@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <2444@runxtsa.runx.oz.au> <1990Oct19.180646.8649@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <45940@apple.Apple.COM>
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 3

Those of us who can still remember programming large systems using the
untype-checked interfaces of K&R C -- verses the type-checked interfaces
of ANSI-C and C++, will certainly vote for the latter.