Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!udel!rochester!rutgers!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!hoss.unl.edu!riddle
From: riddle@hoss.unl.edu (Michael H. Riddle)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: logistar (logistan?) and Revlon
Message-ID: <1990Oct28.123732.17333@hoss.unl.edu>
Date: 28 Oct 90 12:37:32 GMT
References: <15913@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1990Oct27.022442.16115@lavaca.uh.edu> <1990Oct27.161200.18165@hoss.unl.edu> <1990Oct27.220708.29825@eff.uucp>
Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Nebraska, Computing Resource Center
Lines: 20

In <1990Oct27.220708.29825@eff.uucp> mnemonic@eff.uucp (Mike Godwin) writes:

>>How about it, Mike Godwin?  Remember enough from Secured Transactions?

>What I remember from secured transactions is not the right stuff--the
>bar course emphasized perfection of security interests, not the 
>process of repossession.

>I suspect that a criminal-law issue may be raised by unauthorized
>entry into Revlon's computer, if in fact it was unauthorized.

Hmm.  Interesting point, but then taking someone's car off the street can
be either theft of repossession.  Does the UCC language "except for breach
of the peace" authorize "peaceful" breakins?


--
riddle@hoss.unl.edu                  |   University of Nebraska 
riddle@crchpux.unl.edu               |   College of Law
mike.riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org  |   Lincoln, Nebraska, USA