Xref: utzoo news.admin:10940 news.misc:5625 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:13576 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!usc!bbn.com!drilex!dricejb From: dricejb@drilex.UUCP (Craig Jackson drilex1) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.misc,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Internet/NSFNet proposal to be run by IBM -- call to action! Summary: IBM doesn't exist solely to produce bad products Message-ID: <16121@drilex.UUCP> Date: 30 Oct 90 05:21:14 GMT References: <1990Oct28.220432.521@ddsw1.MCS.COM> Organization: DRI/McGraw-Hill, Lexington, MA Lines: 45 In article <1990Oct28.220432.521@ddsw1.MCS.COM> karl@mcs.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes: >This is a call to action by all interested parties. > >There is wind of a proposal stirring in Washington that would place the >NSFNet backbone, and eventually the entire government-run part of the >Internet, into the hands of IBM. It would seem to me, in the absence of *much* more detailed information, that this is just so much conspiracy theory. >Anyone want to bet how long the Internet remains accessible to non-IBM >people? Or whether the Internet ends up another Prodidy, with active >censorship? Whether you'll have to buy an IBM system to hook into it, >since they might decide that TCP/IP is no longer any good and now it's >time to go to SNA or worse? Assuming that IBM has made such a proposal, why should they spend money to turn something working in to something that doesn't work? Not that I think that IBM has turned out many good products over the years, but they don't exist solely to torture computer programmers--they're actually trying to make a buck. Quite a few, in fact. The principal reason why IBM would volunteer to run the NFSNet, etc would be to enhance their standing in the academic technical community. This would encourage them to do a good job--the 'net' community is not one that is easily swayed by appealing to a CEO or two. >Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, !ddsw1!karl) >Public Access Data Line: [+1 708 808-7300], Voice: [+1 708 808-7200] >Macro Computer Solutions, Inc. "Quality Solutions at a Fair Price" P.S. I know people who love Prodigy--just because it can give them a stock quote quickly. As for the active censorship, it seems from reports that they are a bit touchy about criticism. However, any company with "deep pockets" who does not actively censor a bbs service is a bunch of fools--there are simply too many people willing to file a civil suit or criminal charges over all sorts of nonsense. -- Craig Jackson dricejb@drilex.dri.mgh.com {bbn,axiom,redsox,atexnet,ka3ovk}!drilex!{dricej,dricejb}