Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!dino!sharkey!umich!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!jsq From: craig@b11.ingr.com (Craig Presson) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: File system name space (was Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.4: Real-time Extensions) Keywords: More Info Please Message-ID: <14012@cs.utexas.edu> Date: 24 Oct 90 19:11:32 GMT References: <13132@cs.utexas.edu> <13219@cs.utexas.edu> <13689@cs.utexas.edu> <13775@cs.utexas.edu> <13878@cs.utexas.edu> <13878@cs.utexas.edu>, Sender: jsq@cs.utexas.edu Reply-To: craig@b11.ingr.com (Craig Presson) Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville Lines: 55 Approved: jsq@cs.utexas.edu (Moderator, John S. Quarterman) X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net Submitted-by: craig@b11.ingr.com (Craig Presson) In article <13878@cs.utexas.edu>, arnold%audiofax.com@mathcs.emory.edu (Arnold Robbins) writes: |> Submitted-by: arnold%audiofax.com@mathcs.emory.edu (Arnold Robbins) |> |> Anyway, since we're discussing what is and isn't in the POSIX name space, |> I'd like to put in a plug for the /dev/fd directory. Opening /dev/fd/7 is |> equivalent to doing a dup(7); it is a generalization of the "treat '-' as |> stdin" hack used by cat and awk (and others) and allows at least two shells |> (ksh and rc [see your nearest V10 manual]) to do interesting things like set |> up non-linear pipelines. (At least I think rc does it. I know ksh does.) |> |> There's lot of existing practice on this one; it originated in V8, circa |> 1984 or earlier, and PD versions for various, more popular, Unix incarnations |> have been around for some time as well. |> |> (In fact, in V8 - V10, /dev/stdin, /dev/stdout, /dev/stderr, and /dev/tty are |> links to /dev/fd/0, /dev/fd/1, /dev/fd/2, and /dev/fd/3, respectively. The |> last, in particular, is a nice generalization, and eliminates an ugly special |> case in the kernel; init just does one more dup.) |> |> It's going to be fun watching how /dev/fd will be presented as both for and |> against the case for "fd-centric" Unix... :-) Personally, I'm in the put-it- |> in-the-filesystem camp. |> -- |> Arnold Robbins AudioFAX, Inc. | Laundry increases Ah, roger, that's a big "ditto" on the virtues of One Big Namespace for all Permanent Objects. Use subspaces to separate classes (he said tautologically) *. But for those of us without access to every Unix manual ever published (I do have a Version 7 Volume 1), could you fill in a bit more on the semantics of this hybrid /dev entry? Like what do you get when you open "/dev/fd/7" and there is no open file using that slot? Does the system make these entries "invisible" to processes not using them? Do you just get a classic "It's an error from Unix, you're not supposed to understand" type return? Or am I Missing Something? -- ****************************************************** ** Craig Presson pressonc@ingr.com ** ** Intergraph Corporation MS CR1104 ** ** Huntsville, AL 35894-0001 (205) 730-6176 ** ** FAX: (205) 730-6011 ** ****************************************************** * Those not old enough to remember "Tom Swifties" are encouraged to forgive my lapse of taste ... Volume-Number: Volume 22, Number 3