Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc05!hpdmd48!stephen From: stephen@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Stephen Holmstead) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Deskjet Info wanted ! Message-ID: <15440030@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> Date: 26 Oct 90 17:29:44 GMT References: <1990Oct19.100544.8517@uni-paderborn.de> Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise, ID Lines: 39 Rick Wrigley wrote: >Specs are the same, 300 dpi addressable, somewhat less in actuality. ^^^^ What?!?!?!? Less? Are you kidding? :-) Actually, as I have been told (from those who SHOULD know), the Deskjet has a resolution of 600 dpi. The problem is that each of the drops of ink (or pixels) are round and have very sharp contrast on the edges. In comparision, the Laser printers only have a resolution of 300 dpi, but due to the physics involved with the printing process on a laser, the dots (or pixels) are created with small magnetic fields on the print drum and thus, they have very smooth and gradual contrast on the edges. For example, if you were to look at each from the side (sort of pictorially), they would look something like this: ________ _______ | | __/ \__ | | _/ \_ | | / \ _______| |________ ___/ \___ DeskJet pixel LaserJet pixel Visually, the LaserJet pixel has the effect of being 'anti-aliased', whereas the DeskJet pixel isn't. The result is that the Deskjet takes more than one drop of ink to try to produce an 'anti-aliased' 300 dpi pixel. Even still, the DeskJet cannot come close the smoothing effect caused by the magnetic field distribution on the LaserJets. The bottom line is that the DeskJet does NOT have 'somewhat less' resolution, but rather, it has somewhat different resolution. >Still the closest thing you can get to a laser... Yup. ____ ____ | / /_ __\ | Disk 0S/2 == 1/2 OS (Leo Schwab) Stephen Holmstead | | / / /_/ | | Mechanisms // ...!hplabs!hpdmlge!stephen |___\ / /___| Division \X/ Amiga stephen@hpdmlge.boi.hp.com