Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: CALL FOR LOCAL DISCUSSION Revision 2: Split the c.s.a group more? Keywords: reply time limited Message-ID: <6929@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 30 Oct 90 12:21:01 GMT References: <1990Oct28.001448.25414@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <1990Oct29.060811.10094@uncecs.edu> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 29 In article <1990Oct29.060811.10094@uncecs.edu> ruslan@uncecs.edu (Robin C. LaPasha) writes: > 1) Does anyone have any bets on how a "sound" group would do, Be pretentious and call it "audio". And call the other one "video" to make sure the desktop publishing folks don't get confused. They really belong in the .applications group (or comp.sys.mac). The amount of cross dressing between the two groups is unlikely to be a problem. Besides, "multimedia" used to be called "audiovisal". > > comp.sys.amiga.influence > Would they really stay there? Most "ranters" seem to cross-post just to > attract flamage. Be nice if it worked, though... I liked the "mongering" > title too. ;^) I still prefer something like ".futures". Or be honest and call it .flame. > > comp.unix.amiga > Minix? AMIX. > Uh, there is a minix group already somewhere. Comp.os.minix or > >And they're off! > Their... They're. They are off. Jesus, don't nobody learn to talk English good no more? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .