Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!van-bc!
From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: HardFrame Still the Best?
Message-ID: <2163@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: 27 Oct 90 01:17:58 GMT
Lines: 24
Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips>
To: van-bc!rnews

In <04619.AA04619@babylon.UUCP>, rbabel@babylon.UUCP (Ralph Babel) writes:
>In article <6381@ethz.UUCP> visinfo@ethz.UUCP (VISINFO c/o
>
>> Not only is the HardFrame kind of choosy and simply does
>> not accept some strange drives (like Maxtor...)
>
>In case of the MaxTor, this is not really the HardFrame's
>fault: Some MaxTors behave in a non-standard way during
>startup, very similar to Seagates.

Though I can understand the sentiment, it is tough on the credibility when my
Maxtor LXT-100 won't work on my HardFrame, but works perfectly well on the
2090, 2091, and the A3000.

-larry

--
It is not possible to both understand and appreciate Intel CPUs.
    -D.Wolfskill
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+