Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!fps!myamiga!smp
From: smp@myamiga.UUCP (Steve Palm)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: New Kickstart Release for the Amiga 3000 available
Message-ID: <86.272D094C@myamiga.UUCP>
Date: 30 Oct 90 00:26:20 GMT
Organization: The Siberian Amiga --- Sault Ste. Marie, MI
Lines: 18


 In article <15444@cbmvax.commodore.com>, ewout@topcate.cbm.commodore.com
 writes:
 
 > Having setpatch standard in the startup-sequence makes it easier (for
 > the user and Commodore) to implement little patches like these.  

 Does this mean that when you burn the release ROM's that there will already
 be a setpatch on the distribution disks, or that you will be make all the
 changes to date in ROM and then issuing SETPATCH versions as needed?



--  
     ///  AMIGA: | Steve Palm, Sysop of FidoNet node 1:11/16
    ///  FOR THE | UUCP: {gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!myamiga!smp
\\\///  CREATIVE | INTERNET: [not yet available]
 \XX/     MIND   |_________________________________________________________