Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: GUI Style Question Message-ID: <6919@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 29 Oct 90 01:32:20 GMT References: <9480@milton.u.washington.edu> <1990Oct25.212714.26909@unislc.uucp> <10109@milton.u.washington.edu> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 13 In article <10109@milton.u.washington.edu> dlarson@blake.u.washington.edu (Dale Larson) writes: > I just do not see how processing the contents of > a string gadget every time the cursor is removed from it is necessary and > desireable. Since nobody's suggesting you do that, what's your point. Set up your string gadgets and do you checking when they hit "done". If there's a problem leave the window open, display a message, and leave the cursor on that gadget. Programs that are too picky in realtime are annoying. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .