Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!agate!darkstar!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!unknown
From: unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Apple II / Mac discusson (was:Re:Official"No New Apple II's")
Message-ID: <8432@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
Date: 1 Nov 90 21:04:55 GMT
References: <9538.apple.net@pro-angmar>
Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz; Open Access Computing
Lines: 26


In article <9538.apple.net@pro-angmar> kgreen@pro-angmar.UUCP (Kevin Green) writes:
>In-Reply-To: message from philip@utstat.uucp
>
>Phil,
> You're is one of the few truely mature attitudes I've seen here on the net
>regarding the Mac/Apple // debate. Personally, I like the looks of the NeXT
>box myself but can't afford one yet. I also really like my //GS despite the
>fact that it can't do some things some Macs can do. I plan to use my //GS
>until the day it won't function. Then I will evaluate all the CPU's out there
>again and determine which one best suits my home computing needs. A priority
>would be Unix ability so the NeXT and the Amiga 3000 are the main contenders
>now.

	What can the Mac do that the GS can't do? And I'm not trying to
take this argument to such an absurd level where someone can say "What can
the Mac do that the Commodor PET can't?"

	Maybe to make it a little more even playing field, we'll assume the
GS has a Zip GS in it.

	Now I'll ask my question now from an application perspective.. meaning
that obviously you can say the GS doesn't have the resolution the Macs have.  
-- 
/Apple II(GS) Forever! unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu MAIL ME FOR INFO ABOUT CHEAP CDs\
\"If cartoons were meant for adults, they'd be on in prime time."-Lisa Simpson/