Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!canisius!pavlov
From: pavlov@canisius.UUCP (Greg Pavlov)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: 5820 performance ( IO )
Message-ID: <2981@canisius.UUCP>
Date: 1 Nov 90 06:44:52 GMT
References: <1990Oct29.151224.21573@mlb.semi.harris.com>
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo N.Y. 14208
Lines: 18

In article <1990Oct29.151224.21573@mlb.semi.harris.com>, jdr@jrx.mlb.semi.harris.com (Jim Ray) writes:
> Has anyone had experience with 5820's connected to HSC70's ( with
> RA92's )?  I have been less than impressed so far with the IO performance
> and would like to find out if anyone else has had similar experiences with
> the 5820.
> 
> .....  Interresting that the DS5000 IO
> performance even with scsi drives appears to be faster than the 5820.
> 

  We do not have an HSC on our 5810, rather KD's to an SA650 (mix of RA70's
  and RA90's).  Our experiences match yours: throughput on a DS5000 appears
  to be "better" than on a 5810.

   greg pavlov, fatrf, amherst, ny


 moretextmoretextmoretext