Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!usc!apple!olivea!tymix!cirrusl!sunfire!dhesi From: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Boycott Lotus? Keywords: pc Message-ID: <2612@cirrusl.UUCP> Date: 26 Oct 90 19:53:47 GMT References: <2735@naucse.cse.nau.edu> <1990Oct23.233556.6104@agate.berkeley.edu> <1990Oct25.164317.27237@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP Lines: 14 In <1990Oct25.164317.27237@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) writes: The implication seems to be that it wouldn't have mattered if Lotus had lost, but that they are bad guys because they won. I think the point is that if Lotus hadn't won the lawsuit, anything it did would have been moot and a boycott wouldn't be necessary. You don't have to boycott all bad guys, only those bad guys that are in a position to practice their badness. -- Rahul Dhesi UUCP: oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi A pointer is not an address. It is a way of finding an address. -- me