Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!oiscola!dbarnhar From: dbarnhar@oiscola.Columbia.NCR.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Norton v. SUM II (& DeskTop files & ...) Message-ID: <313@oiscola.Columbia.NCR.COM> Date: 1 Nov 90 15:45:33 GMT References: <13738@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> <1990Oct30.231854.2545@midway.uchicago.edu> <1182@skye.cs.ed.ac.uk> <4267@lib.tmc.edu> Reply-To: dbarnhar@oiscola.UUCP (David C. Barnhart II) Organization: NCR/OISD Columbia Lines: 53 In article <4267@lib.tmc.edu> drg@mdaali.cancer.utexas.edu (David Gutierrez) writes: >In article <1182@skye.cs.ed.ac.uk> nick@cs.edinburgh.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) >writes: >> One problem that's going to crop up - when we're all running Desktop >> Manager, these optimisers are probably going to break, since D.M. seems >> to keep its Desktop files open all the time. > >That turns out not to be the case. I just optimized three of my partitions >using Norton Speed Disk while Desktop Manager was active. No problem at >all. It's much better than Disk Express II, which is what I was using. DE >II kept reporting disk directory errors that SUM II, NUM and MacTools >Deluxe couldn't find. I guess it's time to feed Disk Express to Oscar. He >loves trash. > Be careful! I have just talked with Marvin Carlberg (the chief programmer for Norton Utilities) and there IS at least one directory error that version 1.0 of NU can't find (SUM II and MacTools didn't find it either) that Disk Express noticed and as a result, refused to optimize the disk. I sent the copy of the directory (that FileSaver from Norton makes) to him and he confirmed that NU 1.0 did not diagnose or fix this problem correctly. What was interesting, however, was that NU would optimize the disk around this problem. The optimization worked fine, and the problem (which is one of the possible causes of "Folders from Hell") remained. He sent me a fix that I had to do by hand (with a disk editor) that worked fine. My Folder from Hell went away, and the directory error went away as well. I would say that a good way to tell if DiskExpress is off-base is to run DiskFirstAid on the disk. If it refuses to verify the disk, you know that DiskExpress is at least telling the truth. In my case, DiskFirstAid told me I had the error, and NU 1.0 did not discover it at all. (Marvin did say that the problem would be fixed in a future version.) One thing that should be noted: I do not own or use Disk Express; I only borrowed it from a friend to test the disk. I can't really say whether it does a better (or worse) job of optimizing or whether it should be put in the trash. Disk Express is simply more sensitive about optimizing with directory errors present, and it looks as if it was the one telling the truth when it said I had a directory error. In any case, I do use Norton, and it did an excellent job of optimizing the disk, even when the error was present. Dave Barnhart NCR Cooperative Computing Systems Division 3245 Platt Springs Rd. West Columbia, SC 29169 email: uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!secola!oiscola!dbarnhar -- Dave Barnhart NCR Cooperative Computing Systems Division 3245 Platt Springs Rd. West Columbia, SC 29169 email: uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!secola!oiscola!dbarnhar