Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!resnick
From: resnick@cogsci.uiuc.edu (Pete Resnick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: MacTerminal 3.0
Message-ID: <1990Oct31.012421.12492@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 31 Oct 90 01:24:21 GMT
References: <18@uarthur.UUCP> <1990Oct29.173432.10849@svc.portal.com> <24@uarthur.UUCP> <11039@goofy.Apple.COM>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 30

han@Apple.COM (Byron Han, scapegoat) writes:
>Apple IS listening.  And rest assured that any and all comments, good and
>bad, are being taken into consideration for development priorities and
>resource allocation.  This is not a commitment to have functionality X
>in time frame Y, but we are listening...

>Byron Han
>Iceman

I think CTB is a great idea. I love standardization. Don't take this
as an attack. I think you are doing a great job and have given great
input to the net. (End of pre-flame disclaimer.)

(Little candle size flame:)

Does this mean that print-pasthru *is* "being taken into consideration
for development priority", and if so, how high a priority is it? I
think noone really wants a committment; just a little more than a few
sentences that look an awful lot like soft soap. How high is it on
the list?

(end of tiny little spark of a flame)

pr
--
Pete Resnick             (...so what is a mojo, and why would one be rising?)
Graduate assistant - Philosophy Department, Gregory Hall, UIUC
System manager - Cognitive Science Group, Beckman Institute, UIUC
Internet/ARPAnet/EDUnet  : resnick@cogsci.uiuc.edu
BITNET (if no other way) : FREE0285@UIUCVMD