Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!moxie!texsun!newstop!exodus!bari.Eng.Sun.COM!briang From: briang@bari.Eng.Sun.COM (Brian Gordon) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm Subject: Re: BackFAX problems Message-ID: <1880@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 31 Oct 90 16:40:55 GMT References: <2759@esquire.dpw.com> Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca. Lines: 20 In article <2759@esquire.dpw.com> yost@DPW.COM (David A. Yost) writes: >I bought an Orchid fax, which comes bundled with >BackFAX, and I'm not thrilled. > [...] >Anyone have the Abaton Interfax? Yes >Is it good? Yes. Not perfect, but good. I bought it when the 4800/1200 baud version was their only one. When they came out with the 9600/2400 hardware and new S/W upgrade to go with it, they sent the upgrade S/W free. It does the job, is EXCELLENT at both sending and (auto)receiving FAXes in the background under Finder. If I had the money, I'd spring for the 9600/2400 hardware today. As a home unit, I can't justify that (yet). -- :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: | Brian G. Gordon briang@Sun.COM (if you trust exotic mailers) | | ...!sun!briangordon (if you route it yourself) | :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: