Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!gvgpsa!gold!brandonl
From: brandonl@gold.GVG.TEK.COM (Brandon Lovested)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Mac LC (Should I or Shouldn't I)
Message-ID: <1620@gold.GVG.TEK.COM>
Date: 26 Oct 90 19:47:44 GMT
References: <11224@cuphub.cup.edu> <1615@gold.GVG.TEK.COM> <962@skye.cs.ed.ac.uk>
Organization: Grass Valley Group, Grass Valley, CA
Lines: 21

In article <962@skye.cs.ed.ac.uk> nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk writes:
>>The only negative is that System 7.0 provides for virtual memory, which can
>>speed up processing time quite measurably.
>
>Huh?

Oops! I agree, out of context, that sounded funny.  
What I *meant* to say was given system 7.0, the LC can't take
advantage of the virtual memory functionality of it.
That was the "negative."

Pity me...I had a bad day.



==============================================================================
BRANDON G. LOVESTED        ::::=:::==::===:====   FOR EVERY VISION,		
Software Design Engineer   ::::=:::==::===:====   THERE IS AN      
Grass Valley Group         ::::=:::==::===:====   EQUAL AND OPPOSITE	
brandonl@gold.gvg.tek.com  ::::=:::==::===:====   REVISION.
==============================================================================